|
I've read your message again, Jim. I'm stumped, I can't see why you think I was missing the point? At any rate, the real point of my post (aside from the tangent I went off on) is that the argument is pointless. If you don't like these operators, don't vote for them. If you do vote for them. Let the majority decide. On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jim Langston wrote: > Scott, > > Please go back and re-read my message. > > This time read what I wrote, not what you read. > > Regards, > Jim Langston +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.