|
I have a general question on RPG and SQL. It concerns IBMs stated direction to use SQL as the DB access method. Why does RPG SQL compiler need to do a pre-pass. Why have an SQL version at all? I know about Rochester vs some other IBM developers competing internally (within IBM) for dominenance. This has resulted in the SQL versions of the RPG compiler. I find the foibles of SQL NONSQL etc compilation and debugging annoying. Why does not the RPG compiler have better access to SQL rather than all that inserted code to call QSQL??? etc and all those weird DS. I have never used those DS when I use SQL. Why is it necessary to have the SQL version lag the RPG version? If SQL is the bees knees then it seems to me IBM thinks RPG is the pits. Can it be that IBM sees no future for RPG. Can I hazard a guess and conclude IBM wants RPG to slink away and did a lonely and quiet death. Frank Kolmann ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://home.netscape.com/webmail +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.