RE: DoW (WAS DoU...)

["Sims, Ken" <KSIMS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jon -

>PS.  What on earth is wrong with named AGs?  Since they are 
>the foundation for ILE (i.e. the way it was designed to work) 
>I find it hard to guess at what you find wrong with them.

Actually, as I think about it, my objections to named activation groups
don't really apply to service programs.  I stand by my standard of only
using *CALLER or *NEW for *PGMs.  I'll have to think more about service
programs.  Remember, I'm writing my first actual service program, so I'm
still working out what I want to do.  And since I'm the only programmer in
the shop who is likely to ever write any service programs, whatever I decide
to do will be the standard! <G>

Ken
Southern Wine and Spirits of Nevada, Inc.
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of
my employer or anyone in their right mind.

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---