RE: FOR loop

Thanks Scott, that's what I figured. I have a reference manual for V4R4, but
our system is only at V4R2. We will be upgrading soon.
To solve the problem, I just used a DO loop instead.
        
        The 'for' statement was added in V4R4.

        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Ray, Adam [mailto:aray@fhp.org]
        > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 3:10 PM
        > To: 'RPG400-L@midrange.com'
        > Subject: FOR loop
        > 
        > 
        > Can anyone tell me why the following code yields this syntax
error,
        > "Operation entry is not valid; specification is ignored."? I 
        > am on V4R2.
        > 
        > FOR       nn = 25 BY 1 TO 99
        > EVAL      *IN(nn) = *OFF    
        > ENDfor
        > 
        > TIA
        > 
        > -Adam
        
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---