|
Anton Gombkötö wrote: > Sean Porterfield wrote: > >That's why I had to change one of my programs to read every record > >instead of READC. Actually, mine was the opposite - I was losing > >records because the system no longer thought they were changed. > > And the system was right, wasn't it? :-) Well, technically... :) > I assume that you've found errors in the record and wanted the user to > correct it. When the user just presses enter, the record hasn't been > changed. You can mark records as "changed" by using DSPATR(MDT) or SFLNXTCHG. In my program, it was a simple list that users selected from. In the original program, there was only one pass through the display file. The user pressed enter and the program processed the selections. I modified the program and added a few function keys to position the cursor in the subfile (search feature.) After the other messages today, I'm guessing I should have used CA10 instead of CF10 and then I could have left the READC since enter wasn't pressed? (Doesn't matter now since my program works and it doesn't take very long to CHAIN through 250 subfile records.) This probably won't make much sense without the rest of the program logic... +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.