Re: Is this the Free-Format that we asked for? -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Jon.Paris@hal.it wrote:

> Not true - I don't like Leave or LeaveSr either but at least they have the
> benefit of having a language defined target - not one that can be moved
> virtually anywhere in the code!
>

Jon,

I do not agree with you on that. LEAVE jumps to the first END(DO) in the same
subroutine. LEAVESR is like GOTO: it can jump to anywhere in a programme, 
because
a subroutine can be called from anywhere in a programme.

If IBM intents to drop GOTO, they should also drop LEAVESR.

Carel Teijgeler

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.