|
Hello Richard, Sunday, October 15, 2000, 1:48:23 PM, you wrote: > My concern is not that two people can read the data area at the same time. > My concern is that writing the data area requires a synchronous disk write. > If a physical IO is required, I think that my timings are correct - less > than 1 millisecond for a read or write, between 3 and 4.5 milliseconds for > average latency depending on rotation speed. Ok Richard, I thought you were telling everyone that there was a possibility for the data area to become corrupt (in the logical sense). I agree that it does require a sync write, but in the case that the gentleman asked about (up to 10 users at the same time... ie. low transaction volume) it should present no problem, even if he increased it to 100 hits per second it should be fine. What would you suggest? A user space? Or user index? If I am thinking correctly you would have to use a mutex for those approaches and that might require a sync write too. Just curious... I am always interested in learning better ways of doing things. BTW if I remember correctly the trigger test I did was incrementing a data area. +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.