RE: Call Path/400

["Ross Hartford" <rossh@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I hate to have caused such a controversy over my reply.

I didn't state it very well, the product that we sell is a CallPath
implementation tool.  CallPath on the AS/400 is alive and well, although in
a different form than it has been for the past several years.  Our product
lives and dies by CallPath.....  Please contact me privately at
mailto:rossh@ccslink.com for additional conversation.

Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of rob@dekko.com
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 1:28 PM
To: RPG400-L@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Call Path/400



He replied to an earlier email.  I guess I don't have too much a problem
with that.  I don't believe the earlier email was staged, just to allow him
an opening.  We have numerous vendors who reply.  Granted it would have
been better if he replied with the current status of Call Path, and then
disclosed that he markets an alternative product.  But maybe he didn't
reply on the status of Call Path because he didn't want to say anything
negative ;-)


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---