RE: RPG/400 pgm strange behavior

Mark:

Please post code that performs as you describe to this list.  Using a
command interface to solve this problem is pointless and a gigantic waste of
CPU and human cycles.

Richard Jackson
mailto:richardjackson@richardjackson.net
www.richardjacksonltd.com
Voice: 1 (303) 808-8058
Fax:   1 (303) 663-4325

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Mark Holliday
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 6:09 AM
To: 'RPG400-L@midrange.com'
Subject: Re: RPG/400 pgm strange behaviour


Marcin Sagan wrote:

> Mark
> You right.
> When I call from cmd line into pgm it works (I mean don't works -
parameters are
> overlayed). But this is only this situation (cmdline to pgm), am I right?

Actually, Marcin, I had this problem calling from a CL pgm into a CL pgm.  I
think you
might even have this problem calling from an RPG pgm into a CL pgm.  Someone
down this
thread stated that you could create a command, which would then allocate
memory for the
size of a given field.  That sounds like a good solution, as well.

Mark
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---