Re: R: RPG Indicators

["Peter Dow" <pcdow@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jon,

I just ran into this yesterday. When using SETLL to determine if a
particular key exists, using %found doesn't do it. You *have* to use the
equals indicator. %found will return true if an exact or generic match is
found, even if the equals indicator only is specified.

Peter Dow
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 425-0194 voice
909 425-0196 fax



----- Original Message -----
From: <Jon.Paris@hal.it>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: R: RPG Indicators


>
>
>  >> The problem I have with this is that it is not consistent.
>
> Sorry David but I have no idea what you mean.  How much more consistent
can you
> get than 1 built-in has an exact correlation to 1 "indicator" ?
>
>  >> When was the last time you needed to know if a record was found on the
setll
> preceding the last read?
>
> Again I just don't know what you mean here.  I don't think I do need to
know,
> and I don't see any way in which the current built-ins force you to worry
about
> it.  Do you mean that you use a single indicator for everything and then
"copy"
> that into a specific state variable ?
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---