Re: Y3K or not to Y3K

Don't you guys recognize a jest when you see one?  I got a great laugh out
of it Booth.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Klement" <infosys@klements.com>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2000 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: Y3K or not to Y3K


> Maybe I don't understand your question...   but why WOULDNT you use
> 8-digit dates?  What would it gain you to use 6-digit dates?
>
> I don't really think Y3K is a problem, right now... but Y2.1K (if
> we're going to keep using this silly acronym) is only 100 years
> away, do you want your company to get stuck with problems then?
>
> Seems to me that its not ANY extra work to use 8-digit dates instead
> of 6-digit dates.   The two lousy bytes of disk space can't possibly
> be an issue... why would you want to create another situation thats
> similar to Y2K?
>
> boothm@earth.Goddard.edu wrote:
> > An interesting question was just asked here.  Why, on a brand new
> > application with no dates prior to Jan. 1, 2000 are we using an
> > 8-digit date?  L-Date fields are not relevant  -  this is an *M36
> > installation and likely to remain so.
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---
>

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---