|
Paul, agreed. I wasn't disagreeing with the original statement, just wanted to highlight the "proper use" of REFFLD(*SRC). And I don't want to talk about screaming - spend eneough time doing it without talking about is as well :-). Paul pcunnane@learningco.com wrote: > > "Actually, there is a place for REFFLD(*SRC). Think how easy something like >the > 6 to 8 data change would have been if you had something like" [snip] > > Agreed - but in the original example, the *SRC references were > iterative. You want to talk about screaming... > > :) > > ____ > Paul > +--- > | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.