Re: Exception vs function-check; ILE vs OPM

Thanks for the info on shared activation groups. Barbara Morris has already
explained the problem in an earlier post, but thanks for the suggestion
anyway.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Jon.Paris@halinfo.it>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Exception vs function-check; ILE vs OPM


>
>
>  >> I don't see anything on the CRTBNDRPG or CHGPGM commands that lets me
> specify shared act.grp *YES
>
> Ignore this - only IBM can use shared AGs (shared means shared _between_
jobs)
>
>  >> Any other ideas?
>
> I'd suggest stripping the thing down to the essential "bits" - create a
skeleton
> program that replaces the menu and calls the CL prog directly - leave off
the
> indicator on the call and see what happens.  Then add the indicator and
observe
> etc.
>
>
>
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---