× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. December 1999

No Subject

  • From: "Steven N. Laux" <uncle1@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 07:34:45 -0800
  • Organization: Valu-Rite Services
I am not sure, but I think that you can not have several MONMSG statement one after the other. I think the second MONMSG will monitor error generated by the 1rst MONMSG, not the CPYF command.

Denis Robitaille
Each successive MONMSG should pertain to the original CL command, not to the prior MONMSG command or to any command that might happen to be executed within the prior MONMSG DO-Group.  In conditions where several errors may happen, as long as the second MONMSG is immediately outside of the DO-Group accompanying the prior CL command it should monitor for multiple errors and potentially respond uniquely.  However, if the DO-Group contains commands and another MONMSG appears inside the DO-Group, the MONMSG pertains to the command inside the DO-group.
 
Steve Laux
 
 

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.