RE:Procedure Failing

[pytel@xxxxxxxxxx]

There's nothing wrong with service program running in its own activation
group.
But from general point of view I would say that it's better, when original
program runs in a named activation group and service program runs in
activation group *CALLER.
In this way if later you will have another application running in another
activation group, then both applications may use the same service program
and still be isolated from each other.

Best regards
    Alexei Pytel


"Mark Walter" <mwalter@netrax.net> on 12/08/99 01:20:01 PM

Please respond to RPG400-L@midrange.com

To:   RPG400-L@midrange.com
cc:
Subject:  RE:Procedure Failing




All,

Thanks to the list for all of the help. I created the service program to
run in the QILE activation group and left the ILE RPG program to which the
service program is bound as ACTGRP(*CALLER) and all seems to be working
fine. If any of you ILE gurus see a potential problem with this scenerio,
please let the list know. I would like any to know any potential pitfalls
before I start more ILE development.

Thanks again
Mark

All,

 

Thanks to the list for all of the help. I created the service program to run in the QILE activation group and left the ILE RPG program to which the service program is bound as ACTGRP(*CALLER) and all seems to be working fine. If any of you ILE gurus see a potential problem with this scenerio, please let the list know. I would like any to know any potential pitfalls before I start more ILE development.

 

Thanks again

Mark