RE: Procedure failing

["Hatzenbeler, Tim" <thatzenbeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why would *caller be to  expensive to implement?  Is it a performance
problem?

thanks,
tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mdrazic@ORIENTAL.COM [SMTP:mdrazic@ORIENTAL.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 9:41 AM
> To:   RPG400-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: Procedure failing
> 
> 
> 
> I don't know if this will help or not.  About 1 1/2 years ago, at a prior
> situation, we initially tried to implement Service Programs.  We also
> received
> similiar error messages within 3 calls to a Service Program where the
> caller
> would lose its "link" to the Service Program.  After months of going
> round-about
> with IBM, they claimed that there was too much "junk" in the PAG.  We were
> using
> Group Jobs in our menu system, sharing access paths, hundreds of
> pre-opened
> files, using Return instead of LR, etc.  Their suggestion was to try
> *CALLER
> NEW, which is what I would suggest to use at the caller level to see if it
> helps.  At the time, we felt that this was way too expensive to implement
> in
> production, but it might narrow down your problem.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---