RE: Runtime KLIST change?

[Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>]

I have this point also.  Why do people insist in messing with the AS/SET 
generated code?  
Do they also insist with messing with the machine code generated by the RPG 
compiler?





Williamsc@technocrats.co.uk on 12/06/99 10:38:07 AM
Please respond to RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      
Fax to: 
Subject:        RE: Runtime KLIST change?

Isnt that the point of a 4GL. You dont care about the code it generates,
because its generating your whole application. If your going to fiddle
around with the code afterwards, why bother with the 4GL?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: L. S. Russell [mailto:leslier@datrek.com]
>Sent: Monday, December 06, 1999 1:53 PM
>To: RPG400-L@midrange.com
>Subject: Re: Runtime KLIST change?
>
>
>>
>
>> Forgive me for tossing my two cents in, but obviously you 
>have never seen code
>> written by SSA. SSA, the "authors" of BPCS (Big Piece Of 
>Computer SH*%) use a
>> 4GL tool called asset to generate all their product.  If you 
>like I will send
>> an example. But trust me when I say RPG generated by this 
>bleeding edge
>> technology is the epitomy of unmaintainable code.
>

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---