|
>> Static storage is scoped to activation group, so if programs from different >> activation groups are calling modules in a service program, running in a >> named activation group, they should expect to see changes to static >> variables, made in previous calls, even coming from unrelated activation >> groups. Alexei, what does this mean exactly. Can up supply an example. I make call into service programs running in a named activiation group QSRVPGM and I have never seen a static storage variable change between calls. If it did, I would have all kinds of service programs that would not work. What I do quite often is to build the program smart enough to handle multiple calls from different users into the same service program at the same time. I do this by allocating all my data structures with heap storage and then keeping a table in static storage with nothing but an integer number and a pointer to the data structure for that user. The user passes me the integer number they got from an earlier call to an initialization function and I use that number to lookup the pointer to that users storage. In other words, dynamic memory management but, if what you are saying is true, this would never work. The static storage wouldn't be there from before or would have been changed. Am I missing something? Thanks Alan Campin alan.campin@caselogic.com -----Original Message----- From: pytel@us.ibm.com [mailto:pytel@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 1:19 PM To: RPG400-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: Service Programs in Named Activation Groups Static storage is scoped to activation group, so if programs from different activation groups are calling modules in a service program, running in a named activation group, they should expect to see changes to static variables, made in previous calls, even coming from unrelated activation groups. Automatic (local) storage is allocated in stack and is not affected by activation group. Heap storage is also scoped to activation group, so all dynamic allocations made from service program modules will go to the same heap (which will be freed when this activation group ends). This may lead to orphan pointers in other activation groups. Basically, there is no problem in using named activation group for service program if you understand what you are doing. Best regards Alexei Pytel +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.