Re: SUBFILE FOR NON DISPLAY PROGRAMMING....(auto redim of arrays)

[HwaRangRon@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 11/1/99 4:21:42 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
Alan.Campin@CaseLogic.com writes:

<< The reason for this is obvious. Safety. The max dimensions on an array or
 data structure is there to prevent a runaway. If your program goes into a
 loop, you don't want to keep going until it consumes all the memory for that
 job. Dim on a variable array or max occurrence just allows you to state what
 is the max number of elements you can have. 
  >>
Yeah, but I have the option to set a file to *NOMAX and run the same risk. 
All I'm saying is we should have the option. After all, I can put a program 
into an endless loop which would play havoc with response time, but the 
compiler still gives me the option of coding a loop.

Ron
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---