|
Buck Calabro wrote: > <<snip>> > Our management frown on the > development of programmer tools - it doesn't generate billable revenue. > Really? The programmer tool providers would be surprised to hear that! <G> Let's see if I understand their philosophy: Take longer, bill more? The first company I cofounded had a senior partner that felt the same way. After I resigned and started my own firm I found that there is no loss of revenue by coming in under budget. The customers are so happy that they request more work from you. I would even go so far as to say it increased revenues. Granted our tools are home grown, but I would hate to do a project without them. They not only reduce the mind numbing grunt work, but ensure a degree of uniformity throughout the application suite. I didn't change by bidding formula's. The time the tools saved me allowed for more design and testing. Improved the quality of the deliverable. And took some of the pressure off the deadline. As the tools became more sophisticated, additional time became available. They also gave me a competitive advantage. Maybe management would understand that one. And no. I'm -not- going to put them out as shareware. <g> +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.