Re: Call or Bound Call

[Jim Langston <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, I too am teaching myself RPG IV/ILE.  I usually is
C        *IN06      IFEQ     *ON

I didn't know I could use
C                        IF           *IN06

and am glad I know that I can, as that is my normal style in
other languages (C, Delphi, Basic, etc...).

I think that if someone is asking about a language they don't know
well, such as RPG IV/ILE it is a good idea to give pointers on things
they may not necessarily know about.

How can someone who doesn't know a language ask a question on
something he doesn't know exists?  <g>

Regards,

Jim Langston

Joel Fritz wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jon.Paris@halinfo.it [mailto:Jon.Paris@halinfo.it]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 3:06 PM
> > To: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> > Subject: Re: Call or Bound Call
> >
> >
> >
>
> Almost every reply to the original posting included style criticism of the
> original code.  I wouldn't code it that way (IFEQ) either, but so what?
> It's not real germane to the procedure/prototype issue.
> >
> >
> >  C     *in06         ifeq      *on
> > - why not get rid of the ifeq (shudder) this is fine
> >  C                   If        *In06
> > - or this if you have to code the *On
> >  C                   If        *In06 = *on

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---