Re: Call or Bound Call

 C     *in06         ifeq      *on
- why not get rid of the ifeq (shudder) this is fine
 C                   If        *In06
- or this if you have to code the *On
 C                   If        *In06 = *on

Now on to your question <grin>


 >> From a technical viewpoint, are these two chuncks of code equivalent?  Or,
 >> is the RPG IV code a bound call of some sort?

Yes they are. The underlying call is identical in both cases.

 >> Plus, if they are equivalent, what is the advantage of the RPG IV code (if
any)?

Many advantages. First you get rid of the ugly non-intuitive CALL/PARM.  Second
the use of the CONST keyword allows you to use (for example) an integer value
for the second parameter. Suppose you had the command string in a variable
called CommandString. The following would be fine.

 C                   CallP     RunCmd(CommandString:
%Len(%TrimR(CommandString)))

In other words the use of a prototype can save you from having to match the
exact type and length of a parameter. The compiler will generate the additional
logic to match the parameters.

Third, and perhaps most important, by using a prototype you ensure that you
don't ever screw up and issue a call with only two parameters when three were
needed.


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---