|
Hi Hans - >Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 09:00:46 -0400 >From: boldt@ca.ibm.com >Subject: RE: RE: RPG IV and CF-spec "keep it IBM" >So you're saying RPG is better than C? Would you write a compiler >using RPG? I wouldn't! And it's not its fixed format syntax that >makes RPG unsuitable for compiler writing. On the other hand, >most consider C unsuitable for business applications. When you >say that one language is "better" than another, what you mean is >that one language is better for a particular problem domain. You don't write compilers in RPG!?!?!?!?!?!?!??? <G> I wrote a BASIC interpreter in RPG, along with a RANOL interpreter (RANOL was a stack oriented language that I developed) and a microprocessor emulator. And this was in RPG II on an S/34 and/or S/36. When RPG is all you've got, it's amazing what you can do! Ken Southern Wine and Spirits of Nevada +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---END
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.