Re: RPG IV and CF-spec "keep it IBM"

Bob Cozzi wrote:
> 
> So I ask you, if you do NOT care if the CF-spec every sees the light of day,
> or DON'T want the CF-spec, to voice your opinion now.
> I feel we need an architecture for RPG. We need many poorly designed
> features corrected, we need consistent designs and several new features
> before we effectively turn RPG IV into CL II.
> 

Funny. I thought that we had $100 to spend. I thought that we allocated
that $100 to desired features. I seem to remember that the free format
crap cost $100. SO... I voted my $100 across other functions that needed
those corrections and the high-leverage changes to the language.

What happened to my $100? Can IBM now spend $200? How did that happen?

Screw the free format. If it was free format that they truely wanted and
needed, then migrating to COBOL or PL/I would have done it. 

-- 
===========================================================
R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr.
 -- IBM Certified AS/400 Professional System Administrator
 -- IBM Certified AS/400 Professional Network Administrator

"The sum of all human knowledge is a fixed constant.
    It's the population that keeps growing!"
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END