|
Hans, Change is great! Keep 'em coming. Especially, the BIF's. Also, is there any way you could light a fire under the SQLRPGLE precompiler guys to get them to bring it up to the ability to understand RPGLE? It ignores compiler directives (bringing in entire copy members instead of just the sections that are defined), local variables in sub-procedures, etc. Why does it even concern itself with anything other than the actual SQL statements? Even if it "thinks" a variable is defined multiple times (because it is in more than one procedure), it should leave that to the "real" compiler to catch. -----Original Message----- From: boldt@ca.ibm.com <boldt@ca.ibm.com> To: RPG400-L@midrange.com <RPG400-L@midrange.com> Date: Monday, July 12, 1999 12:56 PM Subject: Re: Move an entire record format as a whole The best way to reach the real users of our product >is features that programmers can best appreciate. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List! To submit a new * * message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe * * from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message. Questions should * * be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.