|
> > the 'lets > >not do free form' decision has always been a mystery. I cannot think of, > >and have never heard, a single cogent argument against free form. It is > >utterly baffling. > It isn't baffling to me. While I like the idea of a CF spec I will be > quick to also say that I have a recurring nighmare of seeing RPG > metamorphise into some sort of C. Having seen and had to work with code > from 10+ years ago I now realize that today's hot idea can become next > decade's trivia test. See? Baffling. If you want to put each op code in postition 23, you can do that with a free form language. You can do that in C right now. Did you ever wonder why nobody does? Read 'the elements of C style' or 'code complete' and find out what we are missing. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List! To submit a new * * message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe * * from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message. Questions should * * be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.