Re: nuther activation group question

["Scott Klement" <infosys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In my experiences, I haven't seen much use for named activation groups
and therefore, I don't use them.

The way that I'd do this is to have my initial CL program be
compiled with an activation group of *NEW.

Then, all of the programs that the CL calls (and they call, etc)
should be compiled with an activation group of *CALLER.

When the CL program finally ends, it'll end its activation group,
therefore ending all of the service programs.

The only reason I can think of to use a NAMED activation group
would be if you DIDN'T want it to be reclaimed when the initial
program in the activation group ends...  Which doesnt make sense
to me.

I suppose they could also be used in a scenario where you wanted
to scope file opens to one whole group of programs, and have a
different scope to another whole group of programs that were all
running (back & forth) under the same job... but I have never run
into a situation where this would be useful.

Maybe someone can point out what the use of named groups is?

"Tony Corbett" <corbett@CBT400.COM> wrote:
> I would like to use a named activation group in a similar way I have
>  used RCLRSC in the past, ie., the cl calls an RPG pgm which leaves
>  files open and programs sitting out there (LR *OFF) and then does a
>  rclrsc at the end.
> However, if the CL starts an activation group, it cannot reclaim the
>  activation group, cause it is still the same JOB and a JOB cannot
>  reclaim itself??
>
> How are you handling this???
>
> Thanks for the help/advice I have received so far...
>
> Tony Corbett
> corbett@cbt400.com  as of 6/1/99 corbett@asresources.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List!  To submit a new         *
* message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe   *
* from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify       *
* 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message.  Questions should *
* be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com          *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *