|
David Morris wrote: >Any reason why source cannot be treated as just another attribute of a >program object? In the majority of cases, programs without source are of >little value (except purchased programs). It would be really nice if the >operating system just kept these things together. This wouldn't have to be >the default, just an option. I see no benefit in forcing a recompile or >using an MI utility to update a programs based on source information when I >rename a source library, etc. Even after doing a recompile and comparing >objects, I cannot ever be assured two programs have been created from a >particular source member. Of course there would need o be some new command, >and a few options would need to be added to the retrieve program >information. I've no arguments with what you suggest. But, I don't think it would really help the majority of people who lose their source code. Cheers! Hans Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List! To submit a new * * message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe * * from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message. Questions should * * be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.