Re: eM Client email client

Well I am learning in this thread there are potentially ways to alter my
own behavior on the subject so I'll start attempting to do that.

I'm also going to check out that eM Client

Jim Oberholtzer
CEO/Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:08 PM, John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Jim Oberholtzer
<midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

John, I'm guessing you're one of those younger folks that thinks along

the

lines that the google developers do, I just don't see the google email
client as that friendly (neither do most of my colleagues). If you need

to

completely change how you think about something as simple as email in

order

to use the client, the client is the problem not the user.

No one said the problem is the user. And "different" isn't the same
thing as "better" or "worse". But different is often useful, and
sometimes things are different enough that you have to rework your
thinking *if* you are going to extract the value from that different
thing.

Would you say SQL is very "unfriendly" because it is awkward and
inefficient to do record-level access with it? What could be simpler
and more straightforward than accessing database records with RLA,
right?

I'm not young, but I'm not particularly old. My cell phone is the kind
that folds and has a tiny screen and touch-tone-style keypad. I leave
it off most of the time. My car has a manual transmission. There are a
lot of areas where I stick to traditional stuff, and other areas where
I've embraced newer things.

John Y.
--
This is the PC Technical Discussion for IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) Users
(PcTech) mailing list
To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.