× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Walden H. Leverich skrev:
Just to clarify, you don't mean a 32K limit on the mailbox, you mean a
32K limit on the RULES for the mailbox. And unfortunately that is the
limit for Exchange 2003. Exchange 2007 ups that limit to 64K by default,
and can be expanded to 256k.
If you just deployed Exchange a month ago you did deploy Exchange 2007,
no? In Exchange 2007 you can change the size of a mailbox's rules quota
using the "set-mailbox -rulesquota" powershell command. If you're still
on 2003 for some reason, then, um, that's what you get for running a 5
year old mail system.
I'll bite :) So if the rules cannot fit in 256 k either, thats what he gets for running a brand new mail system?

Personally I have found my work email to be sacrosanct, and I don't use it publicly as it is so hard to change to a new one (and let everyone know you changed). It is much easier to create a hotmail account (or yahoo, or gmail), and use it for mailing lists like this one. I found a connector for Outlook which allows me to download Hotmail mail, and that might be a solution for the original poster.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.