× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This isn't a new phenom - just a lot better organized and more
efficiently enacted.

I remember in the early web years there where squatters would register
domains for music, tv and film stars, and corporations large and
small, hoping to cash in by selling them when squatee decided to
create an internet presence.

I remember some high profile legal battles where the squatee would sue
for the use rather than pay them off.  I don't remember the outcomes
of those trials though. anyone else?

On 8/1/06, Mike <koldark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, it is policy that there is a 5 (or so) day refund. If they don't get a
certain number of hits on the domain, they just cancel the order and they
don't loose anything. If they do get hits, they keep the domain with the
advertising on the site and make hundreds. It sounds like ICANN runs a bit
slow and too much politics are involved (much like most things in life).

The domain I mentioned earlier? Just looked it up... taken and is one of
these sites.

On 8/1/06, Chuck Lewis <chuck.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That made me really wonder too. Ditto for the author. That or like he
> said,
> someone in that groups server got hacked ?
>
> But you know it all goes back to the inactivity of ICANN in this area.
> Just
> like that deal brought to light, what, last month I think (?) where you
> can
> register a name and not pay right away but tie it up and there were
> MILLIONS
> of domains in limbo that way !
>
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of David Gibbs
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:24 AM
> To: pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PCTECH] Whois Hijacking My Domain Research?
>
> Chuck Lewis wrote:
> > VERY interesting read.
>
> Very interesting indeed.
>
> In order for any whois service to get detailed information, they would
> need to query the internic to see what registrar is holding the domain
> ... I wonder if Chesterton Holdings somehow has an inside track at the
> internic?
>
> david
>
>
> --
> This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
> or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.
>



--
Mike Wills
koldark@xxxxxxxxx
http://theriverbendpodcast.com
--
This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing list
To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.