|
*** Transferring from WDSCI-L *** Mark S. Waterbury wrote: > The idea that a browser requires the user to decide when to "flush the > cache" is absurd, IMHO, and was/is a very poor design decision, especially > in light of (non-technical) "end users" ... :-o >From my experience, having the user flush the cache is a problem solving technique ... if everything works right, the user should not have to flush the cache ... but if something does go wrong, the cache must be manually flushed. Of course, flushing the cache seems to be the standard first response out of every support persons mouth these days ... my DSL service was down a few weeks ago and I called support ... and was told to flush the cache, even though I had just told the support rep that the connection light on the modem was off. > Instead, browsers should be smart enough to check periodically (or as > needed) to see if files in the cache have been updated, and refresh them > automatically, or just delete them when they are detected to be > "out-of-date" so they will be downloaded again "on demand" when and if > needed. Which is what it does. To be honest, I've found very few problems that flushing the cache actually solves ... at least in an end-user situation, but that's just me. david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.