× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



~~~Connections?  Do you mean VPN connections or NAtting or port
~~~forwarding or
~~~... A 233 MHz computer should handle a LOT more than 6 NAT
~~~connections.
~~~Should do more than 6 VPNs also.

I don't get it. If I understand you all correctly, IP COP runs on a computer
and bandwidth travels through it.
An older or newer computer would surely limit bandwidth, more so to six
connections.
I think it is fair to say the older computer could be the slowest link of
the network.
Granted, my cable modem restricts me to X. But my Linksys device should not
cause any further performance degradation.
And if a really fast IP COP box would yield more effective bandwidth beyond
an appliance, that would be an added plus to the enhancement of security.

And so my thought is the $2000 dollar Cisco appliance may be well worth it
if you need a specific security without degradation.

Just my 2 cents.

-Mark




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.