|
There is a difference between getting fiend, and getting fined AND paying for all the legal fees. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Walden H. Leverich III" <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users'" <pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:19 AM Subject: RE: [PcTech] Rockin' on without Microsoft > >From: JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > >they would have gotten the fees that were due, > > And fines and back interest? > > Or are you saying that if BSA came in and said, oh, you're non-compliant, > you have five copies of xxx that you don't have a license for, each copy > costs $100 please pay the software maker $500 everything would be ok? > > If the former, ok, if the latter, then every company should simply be > _willing_ to pay for software. IF they ever get audited then they'll pay > what they would have in the first place, if they're not audited then they > don't have to pay for software at all. > > -Walden > > ------------ > Walden H Leverich III > President > Tech Software > (516) 627-3800 x11 > (208) 692-3308 eFax > WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.TechSoftInc.com > > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:22 AM > To: pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PcTech] Rockin' on without Microsoft > > > > > > > > <snip> > Interesting article indeed. The thing that hit me most was: > > >... [BSA] conducted a raid and subsequent audit ... that turned up > >a few dozen unlicensed copies of programs. > > And > > >"We won't do business with someone who treats us poorly." > > Now, when you are using unlicensed copies of software who is treating who > unfairly? > > -Walden > </snip> > > OK, Walden I can see you're point, however what you did not mention in the > article was Ball's point that if the BSA had come in and asked for a > voluntary audit, and worked with the company, instead of using the Gestapo > jack boot up front, they would have gotten the fees that were due, and most > likely kept a customer. Remember we are talking about 8 (eight) copies, > not 1000s. A little common sense would be nice with these fellas. We > had a company in Wisconsin that was treated the same way as Ball, and beat > the audit 100%. BSA did not have to pay back this company for the money > they spent to defend themselves. (almost 20% of the gross profit for the > year) Why is that? > > Jim Oberholtzer > > _______________________________________________ > This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing list > To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech > or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech. > _______________________________________________ > This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing list > To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech > or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.