|
<snip> >Also since WinDOHS is so adverse to >JAVA, you don't know what Redmond will do to you. You aren't actually implying that MS would release something that intentionally disabled/disrupted Java, are you? Maybe I'm a little too pro-MS, but that's a rather far out conspiracy idea. </snip> No, not intentionally, they would never live that down and the courts have already ruled on that point. My point is, however poorly stated, is that Microsoft likes to try and set standards that benefit them, and put down competition. Many of the so called standards that Microsoft comes up with conflict with where industry is headed and directly conflict with competitors. There is also a war between .Net (or 2003 if you prefer) and Java right now. Personally I think if Microsoft would just develop its product, which is in some ways very superior to Java, and worry more about quality than trying to control/corner the market, they will get their fair share of the server marketplace. Microsoft is not happy with building a better product, they want to destroy anything that may give them real competition. Jim Oberholtzer
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.