|
Fool's errand? I would say that depends. If you're willing to think in
terms of "information flow" rather than *parameters* per se, then it's
fine.
The simplest and most straightforward way to get information out of
called Python code is for the Python code to "leave" it somewhere to
be picked up by the caller. (I use this verbiage to contrast with the
idea of "passing" information directly back to the caller.) The most
natural choice, from the Python side, would be an IFS stream file. But
it should be fairly easy to leave the information in a database table
or other QSYS.LIB objects (via iToolKit).
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.