|
I'm trying to use SSH because it's the "right thing". So far I've only
seen downsides to it. Can you elaborate as to why it's better than PASE?
-----Original Message-----
From: John Yeung [mailto:gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 12:42 PM
To: IBMi Open Source Roundtable <opensource@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IBMiOSS] Node troubleshooting for noobs?
Aaron said:
Stop using QP2TERM and use SSH instead. It will solve future heartache.
Justin said:
I've loaded PuTTY now. It's not like the Bash shell I'm used to, andI'm not a fan. I'm sure I can find the help files and make it work.
If you are used to any of the Unix or Linux shells at all, and want to
even vaguely replicate the experience on PASE, then QP2TERM is simply not
an option. You need a proper TTY interface, which SSH provides and which
5250 does not.
Whatever worst-case scenario you have with SSH is already better than the
best possible 5250 scenario, with respect to command-line interface on PASE.
John Y.
--
This is the IBMi Open Source Roundtable (OpenSource) mailing list
To post a message email: OpenSource@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/opensource
or email: OpenSource-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/opensource.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.