I'm trying to use SSH because it's the "right thing". So far I've only
seen downsides to it. Can you elaborate as to why it's better than PASE?
From: John Yeung [mailto:gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 12:42 PM
To: IBMi Open Source Roundtable <opensource@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IBMiOSS] Node troubleshooting for noobs?
Stop using QP2TERM and use SSH instead. It will solve future heartache.
I've loaded PuTTY now. It's not like the Bash shell I'm used to, andI'm not a fan. I'm sure I can find the help files and make it work.
If you are used to any of the Unix or Linux shells at all, and want to
even vaguely replicate the experience on PASE, then QP2TERM is simply not
an option. You need a proper TTY interface, which SSH provides and which
5250 does not.
Whatever worst-case scenario you have with SSH is already better than the
best possible 5250 scenario, with respect to command-line interface on PASE.
This is the IBMi Open Source Roundtable (OpenSource) mailing list
To post a message email: OpenSource@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: OpenSource-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.