Safest thing to do is ... not to program :) Stay home, pull blanket over
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:16 PM, John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Jack Woehr
Java is very safe, you have to know the collection classes, they're
complicated. You can always do what you need to do.
I think we have very different ideas about what "safe" means.
Your argument seems to be: As long as the programmer really knows the
ins and outs of a language's complicated constructs, the programmer
can take steps to avoid getting themselves into trouble; and therefore
that language is "safe".
By this argument, what languages AREN'T safe?
This is the IBMi Open Source Roundtable (OpenSource) mailing list
To post a message email: OpenSource@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: OpenSource-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
Absolute Performance, Inc.
12303 Airport Way, Suite 100
Broomfield, CO 80021
NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE: This communication including any and all
attachments is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain
confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying further
distribution or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received
this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy
all copies of this communication immediately.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.