×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
----- Message from "SJL" <sjl_abc@xxxxxxxxxxx> on Tue, 25 Mar 2008
18:57:14 -0500 -----
. . .
. . .
. . .
All told, when Congress passed the H-1B visa legislation in 1990, they
sold
out U.S. technical and professional workers just like they sold out
manufacturing plant workers in 1992 with NAFTA...
- sjl
Don't get me wrong. I'm all for keeping American jobs, etc. But NAFTA
hasn't really displaced American jobs that much. I'm not going to cover
the argument about how much of certain products we freely export to Canada
because of it. Rather the point I'm going to make is how many products do
you see with "Made in Canada" or "Made in Mexico" or "Made in North
America" on them? I know part of NAFTA is they don't have to state where
something is made. But here's the real killer to that argument. How many
things can you pick up and look at a tag/label/marking/etc. which says
"Made in China" or "Made in Korea"? China/Korea doesn't benefit from
NAFTA. China benefits from the administrations and supporters of the most
favored nation trade status. Things like this have done far more damage
to American manufacturing than NAFTA.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
