Would this comment still be valid if using a tool from Quadrant
(Formtastic), Digital Designs (FormsServer), or IBM's InfoPrint
Designer?
Granted, these are additional fee products......
Michael Crump
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN 47302
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f
Teamwork is essential; it gives the enemy someone else to shoot at.
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Saint-Gobain. If it did, it would be
folded, mutilated, watered down, politically corrected, and would show
up a week later if at all. If you are not the intended recipient of
this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them,
nor must you copy or show them to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
error.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-nontech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-nontech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Buck
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 3:54 PM
To: midrange-nontech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Overlay printing (was: iSeries revenue plummets)
MichaelQuigley@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The printing architecture is quite capable. If you want something
high
class, it generally costs you something to get it. If you're after a
low-budget solution, is it really honest to complain there is no
modern
printing infrastructure?
These comments are all fair, but I would add that the amount of effort
required to generate very attractive print (say a utility bill with
embedded graphs, full colour, company logo, shading and boxes drawn
around variable length elements) is a tremendous amount of work.
The major complaint I have is that the 'i' in System i is supposed to
mean integrated, not added on at extra expense.
--buck
midrange.com
