RE: Programmer Liability

Or how about blame the manager that didn't put money/time into the
budget/project for making it secure and the programmer gets told "that will
be added in version 2". 

Aaron Bartell


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-nontech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-nontech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuck Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 12:50 PM
To: 'Non-Technical Discussion about the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: RE: Programmer Liability

What a clueless moron that guy is David.

And I agree with you. And if QA fails, that is the companies fault.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-nontech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-nontech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Gibbs
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 11:01 AM
To: Non-Technical Discussion about the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Programmer Liability

>From 
>http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/developer/0,39020387,39228663,00.htm

> Software developers should be held personally accountable for the 
> security of the code they write, said Howard Schmidt, former White 
> House cybersecurity advisor,

Uh huh ... right.  Blame the programmer.  Not the vendor that failed to
perform adequate QA on the software.

Program bugs are inevitable ... that's the nature of things.  Those bugs,
however, should be caught before the code is released.  That's what QA is
all about.

JMHO, of course.

david
(who's a developer)

--
This is the Non-Technical Discussion about the AS400 / iSeries
(Midrange-NonTech) mailing list To post a message email:
Midrange-NonTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list
options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-nontech
or email: Midrange-NonTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-nontech.