I tend to agree. Since OS/400 ('AS/400') was not initially on the list and 
since it's reasonable to assume that any "multiple-vote" inhibitors were in 
place from the beginning, it can be reasoned that the poll takers expected 
multiple-vote attempts from their normal public which generally did not include 
OS/400 proponents.

Perhaps it's true that, as someone once said, a thief believes others are 
thieves. (Of course, that doesn't imply that an honest person doesn't also 
believe others are thieves.)

Tom Liotta wrote:

>   1. RE: best o/s survey...someone's missing a few bits... (Chuck Lewis)
>Probably true, but if they are clever enough to catch multiple instances on
>us, you can't tell me the other folks weren't doing the same thing ;-)
>-----Original Message-----
>[]On Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard
>they probably discovered that the number of votes was phony.
>We only got what we deserved.

Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax    253-872-7904

Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience 
the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.