Chuck: I tend to agree. Since OS/400 ('AS/400') was not initially on the list and since it's reasonable to assume that any "multiple-vote" inhibitors were in place from the beginning, it can be reasoned that the poll takers expected multiple-vote attempts from their normal public which generally did not include OS/400 proponents. Perhaps it's true that, as someone once said, a thief believes others are thieves. (Of course, that doesn't imply that an honest person doesn't also believe others are thieves.) Tom Liotta firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > 1. RE: best o/s survey...someone's missing a few bits... (Chuck Lewis) > >Probably true, but if they are clever enough to catch multiple instances on >us, you can't tell me the other folks weren't doing the same thing ;-) > >Chuck > >-----Original Message----- >From: email@example.com >[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard > >they probably discovered that the number of votes was phony. >We only got what we deserved. -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.powertechgroup.com __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.