|
What are we supposed to do with old computers? They contaminate land fills with gazillion chemicals that could be recycled. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/r3/problem.htm http://www.techrecycle.com There has been a profitable 3rd party market that works with refurbished almost like new 2nd hand equipment. If you have a properly trained computer staff, they know to delete confidential & licensed material from hard disk before letting old computers get into the 2nd hand market. But many companies & individuals with old systems have no such personnel. So there is a security risk if confidential information is contained on the 2nd hand equipment you letting go of, regardless of where it is going. Some places are extremely sloppy about throwing in the garbage computer media that was licensed to them, especially colleges & universities. They get some PCs for labs & offices, that come supplied with the same software that is standard to anything sold to an individual person, but the institution buys a site license authorizing same software installed on hundreds or thousands of machines. This means they have duplicate media sold to them that they do not need. They should delete or destroy the contents of that media, but they cannot be bothered. They just pitch it in the garbage. Along come garbage divers - people who root through the garbage looking for free software ... free to them ... this is illegal, but the way the original software copyright holders manage the sale of their software is to share in the blame for setting up this situation. They sure don't make it obvious to the university what the responsibility is for proper disposal of the media containing software that no one is supposed to have. Computers have value in hands of beginners if IBM or Microsoft etc. supported some OS that would work on refurbished vintage 10 year old hardware. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TYR Message 2168 There are several volunteer organizations that accept donations of old computers to be refurbished & put into good operating condition to be useable by children of poor families in this & other nations, but Microsoft & some other companies are making it progressively more difficult for that charitable service to continue. The old computers cannot run the newer versions of software. They have to have the older versions. Microsoft no longer allows the older versions to be marketed. Microsoft no longer allows the older versions to be transferred to another owner. Microsoft is not the only computer company that is taking this attitude. It would be nice if computer vendors supplied package deal: Here is this old hardware that I am upgrading to a more recent version of Windows or other OS & I bequeath my old PC & the old version of the software to the 2nd hand market ... I want someone who is below me on the economic ladder, who cannot afford a computer, such as children in the 3rd world, to get the benefit of access to my old computer & be able to use the old version of the software, because this old PC does not have the gas to run the latest version. I certify that my old files have been deleted, except what is needed to run this software. I pay some fee to the software copyright authorities & we get paperwork certifying that my new computer & new OS are legal, and also that the package deal of a refurbished old PC with the old stuff are legal to be a hand me down to someone who might not otherwise afford a computer. Help them join the ranks of the users of this technology. I think we should be able to sell or trade in our old technology like we can sell or trade in an old automobile. We just need to do some paperwork & pay some fees. But according to "no dumping" Letter to Editor page 46 of Nov 5 www.eweek.com two USA laws Gramm_Leach_Bliley Act & Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act have made it illegal to dump, donate, or refurbish / resell old computers. So what are we supposed to do with them? I would like to check out whether the letter writer was correctly stating the situation ... perhaps there is some wiggle room in Clintonesque interpretation of some of those words. http://www.politechbot.com/ http://www.attorneys-worldwide.com/USLAWS/WASHINGTON_D.C._LAW.html http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ What were the legislators trying to accomplish with these new rules? http://eon.law.harvard.edu/chill/ http://www.techlawjournal.com/welcome.htm What other alternatives are there? Well we could rent some place to plug them in to help with research. This is OUR computer ... we wish we could resell it but that is now illegal. http://www.intel.com/cure/how.htm Perhaps there are some loop holes left to exploit. Perhaps it is legal to put it some place where it is awful easy to get stolen. Perhaps we can open a remote office then sell off that office to another company in which transferring the assets needed to run that office MIGHT be legal when they include technology. We can claim that we are not reselling old computers but rather they are new computers. Are we allowed to trade them in on a newer model? What is the place that sold us the newer model supposed to do with the old ones & their old parts? Is this good for the future of the computer economy? Sorry Bankrupsy Court You cannot include computers in the assets because it is no longer legal to transfer them ... in fact you now have an inventory storage liability. It is now your problem what to do with the old computers ... you may not sell them, you may not give them away, and you may not raid them for the spare parts. They are going to clutter up the Judiciary buildings until some Judge makes a ruling that this is an insane set of legislative consequences. Sorry Charity In the past we have deleted the confidential stuff on our computer & the software that we are not allowed to resell & we have given you the rest & you have gotten good value out of it & we got a small tax write off, but the new rules have made it impractical for us to continue doing this. We can afford to donate our old stuff to help you do your work, but that not legal any more. It is legal for us to gift you a brand new system, but we can't afford that. So here is a financial donation for you to spend where you most need it. Sorry Computer Vendors We have only got room in our facility for one computer & it is illegal for us to get rid of it so we cannot upgrade to what you are selling. We just will have to continue to try to get the most that we can get out of the stuff we now have. We already have problem of contemporary computer technology becoming a drag on the economy. Ziff Davis John Dodge report page 74 of Nov 5 www.eweek.com claims that informational technology is now behind the 8 ball on productivity. I am not surprised because 99% of computer buyers favor cheapest & get what they pay for ... brain dead security & tech support in name only. Buying cheapest comes with certain trade offs ... you now get to spend 1/3 of your time fighting idiot problems that would not exist if the mantra was to buy quality & security & reliability & etc. instead of cheapest. Dodge cites www.mckinsey.com and www.research.ibm.com as the reasons why systems have become overly complex & that is why they now undermine the productivity of their users. Well people made them that way & people can fix it, or continue to demand the cheapest irrespective of all other considerations & get what we pay for. So have we come to the end of the age of improving computers? Once we buy one it is no longer legal to get rid of it when we want a new one? Perhaps we need to rethink corporate valuation of these assets that we are no longer allowed to trade in on next year's model. There was one place I once worked that renamed stuff. This is not a musical instrument, but "musical goods." This is not books, but paper information. The reason was that we had stores in a shopping center mall where the rental rates were based on the type of merchandise we moved, but no place in the rental agreement was there any definition of terminology. So we renamed all products in our computer inventory from names that had high rents to names that had low rents. Perhaps we can rename our computers to some other label that is not subject to these restrictions. MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.