|
Mark, I am certainly in no position to give legal advice, either. But as a practical matter, you wouldn't necessarily have to give up on the idea of working for some of your empoyer's present clients. Around here anyway, clients sometimes hire away from a consulting agency. But they pay some kind of finder's fee to do that. I didn't get a chance to ask my client if he's done that (although I'm pretty sure he has) and, if so, how much he's paid. But you might be able to float the idea, that if one of your clients want to pick up this kind of fee, you'd be interested in talking employment with them. They may be more than willing, because hiring is pretty much a "pig-in-a-poke", so a lot of companies would lay down some good money to be able to hire a known performer. (That seems to be the misguided theory that keeps a lot of no-account head-hunters in business.) If your current employer is on shaky financial ground, you might not be talking a whole lot of money, either. In your situation, it'd be a delicate matter. You sure wouldn't want to broach the idea with a customer you don't /really/ trust. 'Cause if word got out, prematurely, you might find yourself at the top of the list as far as any future layoffs. (That might not be all bad, in your case. But I still hold to the theory that it's a lot easier, in most respects, to get a new job while you're still working.) But discussing the possibility of your current employer getting some kind of finder's fee, right up front with any of the clients you're currently working for, should show that your also trying to keep their interests in mind, while pursuing your own self-interests and the interests of your prospective future employer. HTH. jjt > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-nontech-admin@midrange.com > [mailto:midrange-nontech-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Mark Villa > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:25 AM > To: midrange-nontech@midrange.com > Subject: layoffs and non-compete > > > If an employer is laying off, and you feel you may be soon, and > take action > (look out for #1) and go to work someone who falls into the non-compete > clause how well does that contract stand. > > During normal times, I understand that their are exceptions etc. and it is > case by case, but in these times I imagine it is more *or* less vigorously > enforced. > > What are your thoughts? > > > Mark Villa in Charleston SC > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Non-Technical Discussion about the AS400 / iSeries > (Midrange-NonTech) mailing list > To post a message email: Midrange-NonTech@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-nontech > or email: Midrange-NonTech-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-nontech. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.