|
Chris wrote: <Very weak and uncalled for, Chuck.> EXCUSE me ? I resent what you imply and I was only providing information... Chill <To say that somehow it was a breakdown in intelligence to fail to prevent last weeks attack based on some info found six years ago.> Do you know anyone that works in intelligence ? I know and I know EXACTLY what many of them feel. This is a classic example of what many of them feel was total frustration in getting information from the human field vs the electronic field... <The intelligence groups who follow up those leads stopped many different terrorist threats in the intervening six years. I image they are sick enough about their failure to stop this one without some second guessing finger pointers to help them out.> Of course they did and I didn't mean to imply otherwise. The biggest boost they had was an undercover Egyptian agent that managed to become the right hand man to the Sheik that is know in prison (and that is the main reason Bin Laden is so ticked off with us - he was very fond of this guy...) No offense intended with any of this, just information :-) Chuck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.