|
> [Jim Damato says]: I wonder if we agree > that bundling/integrating by itself is not cause for an anti-trust suit. I for one strongly agree - bundling/integrating is just a way to attract customers and I do not think that this is a problem in itself. Provided that customer and other businesses have a choice. It becomes a problem if monopoly does this - it can and will wipe out entire businesses. There are things which monopolies should not be allowed to do and in my opinion this is what anti-trust laws are all about. >How's this: > If Linux or Mac/OS or OS/2 had thrived as viable, competitive alternatives > to Windows, would it still be wrong for Microsoft to impose their standard, > integrated/bundled browser on their platform? No, I think in a described case they should be allowed to do this. > Or this: > Given the current situation of Microsoft dominance, what will happen when/if > Microsoft SQL is integrated into the Windows platforms? If it severely > impacts Oracle's market presence, is there cause for an anti-trust suit? Yes, I think Oracle and other DB vendors will have big problem, to say the least. And Microsoft should not be allowed to do this. > Or this: > Hypothetically, what if IBM decides to embed source/object cross-reference > into SEU and PDM and provide it for "free" as a part of that set of licensed > products? As a result, competitive products from Hawkeye, ASC, etc. become > moot. Is there cause for an anti-trust suit? Does it matter if IBM did > this to logically extend the licensed product, or if they did it because > they wanted ASC and Hawkeye out of their way in the middleware market? This is more difficult question. IBM is not a monopoly, but can be considered as a kind of monopoly in this particular market... However, I think that Hawkeye etc make their products not only for OS/400, even if they do, they can potentially diversify to other platforms. Whereas in a browser situation Netscape does not have any place to go... even potentially... Alexei Pytel - speaking only for myself
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.