Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
On Friday 07 September 2001 06:20 pm, Leif Svalgaard wrote: > > While my understanding of an OS came from my father who said to > > me, "If you really want to understand a processor, write an operating > > system for it." > > your father had a point, except that understanding a processor in itself > is not a useful thing to do. You have to put that understanding to work. He seemed to do okay. > My understanding of operating systems comes from having written (or for > one of them participated in writing it) six of them over the years. > You'll see that I here take the narrow view that the OS does not include > the kitchen sink. This was contrary to my other post where I argued that > the OS was "everything that came with the machine". The point being > that both positions can be defended and both can be useful. What I see here is that for a moment you accidentally referred to the actual operating system. You caught yourself. It's okay, I understand. -- Chris Rehm javadisciple@earthlink.net If you believe that the best technology wins the marketplace, you haven't been paying attention.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.