Re: How many IBM i commands are obsolete? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: How many IBM i commands are obsolete?
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:00:02 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Vern,

Am 18.10.2024 um 14:26 schrieb Vern Hamberg via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

The current effort going on seems driven a lot by security vulnerabilities and requirements

Yes. In a way this is good, because it shows that IBM i is recognized beyond its established niche.

decisions are made by what resources (human and time) are available.

See https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1925 paragraph 9. :-)

(Very universal and not limited to networking!)

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: How many IBM i commands are obsolete? , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.