|
One major issue is ownership. Things like WATSONX apparently say that
everything used to "train" has to be publicly visible - I may not have the
right wording.
I'm hearing of discussions in at least one context, that companies won't
put any of their historical data on any public AI site - why give away to
competitors what has taken years to accumulate?
So maybe there will come to be private "chatgpt" sites - although if the
engine used requires openness, there might be a challenge again.
Regards
Vern
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.