× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. January 2024

Re: NVMe's Namespace size

Thanks Stefan, Jim, Patrik

Having used the Multi-Name-Beast (AS400/iSeries/Series5...) for longer then
I care to remember
I know the golden rule "The more disk arms the better"
What I want to know is what performance gain to expect.
However,
having opened a case at IBM I was asked to supply a SYSSNAP (which I have)
for them to evaluate. (they referred me to Expert Labs team first but then
reconsidered)
Let's hope.

Thanks again guys.
Gad

P.S.
Since this is a fairly new machine (6 months) I wonder why the IBM CE that
installed it
did not configure those multitudes Namespaces right then.
Seems like a new recommendation for NVMes

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.